Four Critical Facts to Know Regarding State Incentives to Corporations
(or a Government Incentives Cheat Sheet for Dummies)
The reasons why incentives make sense for everyone is multiple.
- First, incentives benefit everyone: state, county and local governments, the recipient corporation, new employees and more.
- Second, incentive projects are tax creation projects. When corporations get awarded incentives it is because the state expects to have significant new taxes that will come about due to the corporation’s project.
- Third, incentives make sense for in-state governments as they keep between 85-95% of all new taxes. The corporation only gets a “fair” share of perhaps 5-15% as the entity driving the project.
- Fourth, incentives make sense as almost all incentives are performance based meaning if the corporation does not fulfill its promised investments and employee hiring plans, it will get nothing, or at best, a pro-rata share.
- Fifth and last (…as to why incentives make sense), all discretionary incentives that are awarded to corporations are only awarded after a thorough, precise and professionally administered sets of processes, checks and balances.
On to specifics…
Who Are the Beneficiaries
When incentives are awarded, almost everyone benefits:
- a provider of the incentives, a state for instance as it gets new investment, job growth, new taxes, etc.
- a recipient, such as a corporation which can lower its investment costs and enhance its return on investment, perhaps making an investment that wouldn’t have sufficient ROI otherwise
- an employee, hired by a corporation which gets a job, wages and benefits
- an employee, hired as the result of the expansion of jobs in the area, also getting a job, wages and benefits
- the citizens of the area affected some of whom work for the corporation or get indirect jobs such as at contractors to build the new buildings or suppliers of other goods and services to the corporation
Incentives Are a Sharing of Future Tax Revenues
The most important major idea to understand about incentives offered by state, county and local governments to corporations is that incentives are a sharing of future tax revenues. The government projects the future tax revenues by year and by category based upon commitments by the corporation and shares a small portion, “the incentives package”, with the corporation. Unlike most news stories published about government incentives, seldom are economic incentives corporate charity, giveaways or gifts and seldom are they a large percentage of the future taxes which benefit governments and citizens. Governments have processes and oversight to ensure this. More about that later.
Each incentive project is all about creating tax revenue streams for governments. Think of incentive projects as describing a series of mostly corporate planned, future actions centering around investments and jobs. While these actions are planned to benefit the corporation, its employees, suppliers and stockholders, it also will generate tax revenues for the governments and citizens involved. There are local taxes (city and county) and state taxes. Usually, the promised corporate described actions cover three forward years. These economic projects are presented as specific proposals to the governments by the corporation which is considering them. These proposals describe potential planned investments by year in buildings and equipment as well as planned jobs and wages by year by position. From now on I will use the word “state” to describe all three government entities: state, county and local governments. I do not include federal level incentives which will be the subject of an upcoming white paper.
For most incentive projects the states require significant data from the corporation before considering incentive projects and their potential awards. This is all done on a highly confidential basis due to the significant competitive nature of business and the requirement that future, corporate actions and plans not be made public and thus available to competitors.
Once the state has the required information on the project, it can estimate the potential impact on in-state tax revenues. These tax streams occur at a corporate level and include such taxes as corporate income taxes, franchise taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, etc. They also occur at the personal level including personal income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, etc. And the taxes are both direct and indirect. Direct are the investments and jobs created by the project’s corporation investment and associated jobs. Indirect are the investments and jobs created indirectly by the corporate investment and jobs. Examples of indirect include the construction companies that build the expanded building, the suppliers who provide electrical and air conditioning and heating, the cleaners down the street, the food store and department stores and their clerks and managers, landscapers, etc.
Incentives Shared Are Usually 5-20% of Future Tax Revenues
When one reads a news piece on how a corporation, that is planning to relocate to a state or expand in the state, gets incentives valued at $10 million, one often perceives that the corporation is getting this huge windfall and in-state governments are getting very little. Seldom is this correct. Also misunderstood is that the incentives are provided with the announcement and come in the form of a large check. This is very unusual and when it happens is only a small portion of the total incentives offered.
Most incentives will only be shared in the future and only when the corporation fulfills its promised actions. Once those investments or jobs are completed, and proved to the state, only then are the incentives issued perhaps in the form of a check as a reimbursement of specific expenses or in the form of a tax certificate to offset current or future taxes.
Most governments are willing to share with the corporation to make the planned action happen. The sharing is usually somewhere between 5-20% of the future tax and other financial benefits to the state and its citizens that will come about because of the corporations planned actions. The flip side is the government and the citizens utilize 80-95% of the new tax revenue streams.
On small projects this is a roughly calculated amount while on larger projects there will be an economic impact study to determine what the tax revenue streams will be and what part should be shared with the corporation and at what level (state, county or city-local) the sharing should occur. Normally these studies become public record documents and are shared and discussed in public hearings where those impacted get a chance to comment on the proposed incentive package.
Incentives Are 99% Performance Based
As noted above, almost all incentives are performance based. This means if the corporation does not make the planned investment or add the proposed jobs it will receive nothing. Based upon experience, in less than 5% of the incentives awarded is there a component that is upfront before performance and based upon promised performance. And, even then, there are claw backs in the agreements with the corporation to protect the state and the citizens for providing the upfront incentive. As noted above not only must the corporation perform but they must prove they performed by providing, per contract with the state, the required documentation. For jobs created, it will be the number of jobs created, the average wage per job and a description of the responsibilities or the titles of the jobs created. In most instances, these jobs must remain for a period of anywhere from 3-15 years.
Each Level of Government Has a Specific Process and People and Checks & Balances Regarding Awarding Incentives
Each level of state government has a person or persons designated as their representative to attract and retain corporations and employment they create, maintain and hopefully grow.
The economic development professionals are usually people who have chosen this field as a career or part of their career path. They may be educated in business or economics or accounting.
And each government entity has a legislatively reviewed and approved process for finding opportunities for corporations to attract or grow or maintain as well as the employment and tax streams associated with these projects. Programs and award level methods of determination are also approved legislatively to ensure a fair, balanced and objective process is followed.
As a final note in this section, each project that may get an award has significant documentation requirements including forecast investment, employment, wage levels, etc. for a 3 year forward period. Usually this data is evaluated at 3 levels and often over a period of 2-6 months depending on the state, county or local government, before an incentive award is made.
Eighteen (18) New Clients added at Incentives Management Group
FAIRFIELD, Conn., July 8, 2015 – The IM Group signed 18 new clients in the last 18 months and received expanded assignments from seven existing clients during that time period. These new clients and expanded assignments are in regard to a total of 172 locations in 31 states. The IM Group’s multiple-year responsibilities include obtaining incentives and grants from state, county and local governments. These incentives and grants enable clients to decrease investment costs and increase their investment ROI when they are (a) adding new jobs, (b) retaining existing jobs and (c) re-training employees.
The IM Group’s 18 new clients are: Acacia Communications, Inc., AMRI Albany Molecular Research, Inc., Analogic Corp., Annies Organic, Ares Management, Arkema, Inc., Dacor, Inc., Duke Manufacturing, Everspring Partners, Oil- Dri Corporation of America, Oldcastle Building Envelope, Peacock Engineering, Smucker Natural Food, Inc., Qlik Technologies, Inc., RiteScreen, S&S Worldwide, Tennant Company and U.S. Compounding Pharmacy.
Additional assignments from existing clients in the form of expanded responsibilities or new locations include:Carlisle Brake and Friction, Core-Mark International, D’Addario, Fender Musical Instrument Corporation, Icon Clinical Research, Owens Corning and Symantec Corporation.
“We are attributing much of the growth of new clients to be a result of our new free twice yearly analyses offering” said Steve Abbott, President of the firm. He went on “Our basic service package now includes an every six months formal collection of data from the client and a formal presentation of U.S. incentives opportunities. These analyses services are at no cost. If our clients elect to pursue these opportunities we have a very performance oriented fee structure they can utilize to positive impact their ROI.”
The IM Group (www.incentivesmanagement.com) is a professional services firm assisting clients in obtaining incentives from state, county and local governments. The opportunity for these incentives comes about as clients are planning on adding jobs, retaining jobs through investments and due to investments in skills upgrade training of employees. The IM Group works in states representing 91% of Gross Domestic Product. The IM Group’s clients represent a broad array of industries and sectors such as: Aerospace, Consumer Products; Construction Materials; Energy, Industrial Manufacturing, Insurance, Medical Devices, Professional Services and Transportation.
Contact: Iwona Dabek
We obtain government financial benefits as you train, grow or invest.